<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cog Ch 10: Reasoning and Decision Making</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>cognitive psychology @ NGCSU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:01:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glendaliz Batista</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Glendaliz Batista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Site 1:

http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.htm

This site talks about inductive and deductive reasoning.  It tells you how each of them work.

Tags: Cog3310, reasoning

Site 2:
http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/g/ga/gambler_s_fallacy.html

This site talks about prospect theory.  I found it to be very interesting.

Tags: Cog3310, prospect theory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site 1:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.htm</a></p>
<p>This site talks about inductive and deductive reasoning.  It tells you how each of them work.</p>
<p>Tags: Cog3310, reasoning</p>
<p>Site 2:<br />
<a href="http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/g/ga/gambler_s_fallacy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/g/ga/gambler_s_fallacy.html</a></p>
<p>This site talks about prospect theory.  I found it to be very interesting.</p>
<p>Tags: Cog3310, prospect theory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney Hampton</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Site 1:
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php

Review:
this site helped me understand inductive and deductive reasoning better. it is a very good site i think. it is just really informative. 

tags:
cog3310, Chapter10Review

rationale:
cog3310 because we have to and thats what class it is for, and Chapter10Review to help me remember what chapter i am studying

site 2:
http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm

review:
this site helped me to understand the concept of decision making better. I was having trouble with understanding the concept but after reading this site i have no trouble at all.

tags:
cog3310, Chapter10review

rationale:
cog3310 because we have to and thats what class it is for, and Chapter10Review to help me remember what chapter i am studying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site 1:<br />
<a href="http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php</a></p>
<p>Review:<br />
this site helped me understand inductive and deductive reasoning better. it is a very good site i think. it is just really informative. </p>
<p>tags:<br />
cog3310, Chapter10Review</p>
<p>rationale:<br />
cog3310 because we have to and thats what class it is for, and Chapter10Review to help me remember what chapter i am studying</p>
<p>site 2:<br />
<a href="http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm</a></p>
<p>review:<br />
this site helped me to understand the concept of decision making better. I was having trouble with understanding the concept but after reading this site i have no trouble at all.</p>
<p>tags:<br />
cog3310, Chapter10review</p>
<p>rationale:<br />
cog3310 because we have to and thats what class it is for, and Chapter10Review to help me remember what chapter i am studying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth bauman</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth bauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Site #2


http://statpages.org/bayes.html

Review: Site gives clear introduction to Baye&#039;s Theorem if one does not understand fully from the text.  Gives thorough instruction, examples and a fun calculator to test out!

Tags: Cog 3310 Reasoning and Decision Making Baye&#039;s Theorem

Rational: Topic discussed in text but not in class, good study tool for this chapter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site #2</p>
<p><a href="http://statpages.org/bayes.html" rel="nofollow">http://statpages.org/bayes.html</a></p>
<p>Review: Site gives clear introduction to Baye&#8217;s Theorem if one does not understand fully from the text.  Gives thorough instruction, examples and a fun calculator to test out!</p>
<p>Tags: Cog 3310 Reasoning and Decision Making Baye&#8217;s Theorem</p>
<p>Rational: Topic discussed in text but not in class, good study tool for this chapter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy McAtee</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy McAtee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Site #1: http://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/LindenBall20031001T094101.pdf
Review of Site #1: This is a scholarly paper by 2 psychology researchers entitled Cognitive Uncertainty in Syllogistic Reasoning: An Alternative Mental Models Theory. This paper illustrates their theory on syllogistic reasoning and gives evidence to support their research. I didn’t read all the way through it – it wasn’t really that long but it was very wordy. I would recommend it as a resource for an academic paper.
Tags for Site #1: cog3310 cognitive-psychology reasoning mental-models-theory syllogistic-reasoning
Rationale of tags for Site #1: I chose these tags because they name the topics the sites cover and I can easily find them by subject.


Site #2: http://www.psych.ucalgary.ca/thpsyc/VOLUMES.SI/1991/1.1.Evans.JBT.html
Review of Site #2: This is an article from the Theory &amp; Psychology Journal called Theories of Human Reasoning: The Fragmented State of the Art. The author examines the current state of theory in the psychology of reasoning. It’s a little outdated because it’s from 1991, but I found it to be very interesting. It is a very long article, but the author goes over many interesting topics and provides explanations and examples. I noticed that he referenced the author of our text book as well. I would recommend this if someone wanted a different perspective or just wanted to read more on this subject. 
Tags for Site #2: cog3310 cognitive-psychology reasoning
Rationale of tags for Site #2: I chose these tags because they name the topics the sites cover and I can easily find them by subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site #1: <a href="http://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/LindenBall20031001T094101.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploads/LindenBall20031001T094101.pdf</a><br />
Review of Site #1: This is a scholarly paper by 2 psychology researchers entitled Cognitive Uncertainty in Syllogistic Reasoning: An Alternative Mental Models Theory. This paper illustrates their theory on syllogistic reasoning and gives evidence to support their research. I didn’t read all the way through it – it wasn’t really that long but it was very wordy. I would recommend it as a resource for an academic paper.<br />
Tags for Site #1: cog3310 cognitive-psychology reasoning mental-models-theory syllogistic-reasoning<br />
Rationale of tags for Site #1: I chose these tags because they name the topics the sites cover and I can easily find them by subject.</p>
<p>Site #2: <a href="http://www.psych.ucalgary.ca/thpsyc/VOLUMES.SI/1991/1.1.Evans.JBT.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.ucalgary.ca/thpsyc/VOLUMES.SI/1991/1.1.Evans.JBT.html</a><br />
Review of Site #2: This is an article from the Theory &amp; Psychology Journal called Theories of Human Reasoning: The Fragmented State of the Art. The author examines the current state of theory in the psychology of reasoning. It’s a little outdated because it’s from 1991, but I found it to be very interesting. It is a very long article, but the author goes over many interesting topics and provides explanations and examples. I noticed that he referenced the author of our text book as well. I would recommend this if someone wanted a different perspective or just wanted to read more on this subject.<br />
Tags for Site #2: cog3310 cognitive-psychology reasoning<br />
Rationale of tags for Site #2: I chose these tags because they name the topics the sites cover and I can easily find them by subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth bauman</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth bauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Site #1

http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/socex/wason.htm


Review: This site provides multiple examples of Wason tasks and demonstrates how the mind interprets the rules of the tasks.  Describes the rules and how they work with examples and instruction.  We did many exercises similar to these in class for this chapter and this site reinforces those tasks.

Tags: Cog3310 Reasoning and Decision Making Wason Selection Task

Rational: We discussed  and worked through these tasks in class and it is vital part in chapter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site #1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/socex/wason.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/socex/wason.htm</a></p>
<p>Review: This site provides multiple examples of Wason tasks and demonstrates how the mind interprets the rules of the tasks.  Describes the rules and how they work with examples and instruction.  We did many exercises similar to these in class for this chapter and this site reinforces those tasks.</p>
<p>Tags: Cog3310 Reasoning and Decision Making Wason Selection Task</p>
<p>Rational: We discussed  and worked through these tasks in class and it is vital part in chapter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney Jones</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Site 1:
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/gamblers.html
    This website is about gambler&#039;s fallacy, which is a concept I like. This happens because people think when something has not occured for a while then it is more likely to occur. The site has several examples and is just fun to look at. This really will not give one too much information than is in the book, just some examples. 
Tags:
cog3310-for class, gambler&#039;s-concept name and who this effects, fallacy-name of concept and what it is, trickster-because it tricks people

Site 2:
http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/types_reasoning/syllogistic_reasoning.htm
    This website is about syllogistic reasoning. This is a lot like what we did in class. It deals with how there is not always logic behind what we think and reason in our minds. There are some examples and it does not go too much further than our book does on the subject matter. 
Tags:
cog3310-for class, syllogistic-term discussed, reasoning-second part of the term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site 1:<br />
<a href="http://www.fallacyfiles.org/gamblers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fallacyfiles.org/gamblers.html</a><br />
    This website is about gambler&#8217;s fallacy, which is a concept I like. This happens because people think when something has not occured for a while then it is more likely to occur. The site has several examples and is just fun to look at. This really will not give one too much information than is in the book, just some examples.<br />
Tags:<br />
cog3310-for class, gambler&#8217;s-concept name and who this effects, fallacy-name of concept and what it is, trickster-because it tricks people</p>
<p>Site 2:<br />
<a href="http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/types_reasoning/syllogistic_reasoning.htm" rel="nofollow">http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/types_reasoning/syllogistic_reasoning.htm</a><br />
    This website is about syllogistic reasoning. This is a lot like what we did in class. It deals with how there is not always logic behind what we think and reason in our minds. There are some examples and it does not go too much further than our book does on the subject matter.<br />
Tags:<br />
cog3310-for class, syllogistic-term discussed, reasoning-second part of the term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne Shipp</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne Shipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>http://cwis.livjm.ac.uk/lng/teaching/japanese/ENGLISH/tautolog.htm

This site gives examples and explanations of tautology and oxymorons.  The examples it gives are helpful for clarification, and could be used in a paper if an example was needed. 

Tags:Cog 3310 reasoning tautology oxymoron 

 Rational of tags: Cog3310 to delineate class, reasoning to help those searching for things from the reasoning chapter, or reasoning information in general, tautology and oxymoron- subjects of the site page. 

http://aks.rutgers.edu/aksuww/Psych/ConfirmationBias/confirmbias.html

This site gives information about the confirmation bias and provides an activity called dr. aks 2-4-6 sequence rule.  Helped me for a clarification and alternative explanation of the confirmation bias by actually showing how one employs the bias when reasoning. 

Cog3310 Confirmation Bias 2-4-6 sequence rule 

Rational of tags: Cog3310 to delineate class, confirmation bias to describe the site&#039;s subject and help those searching for info about it, and 2-4-6 sequence rule for those looking for an activity to clarify the confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cwis.livjm.ac.uk/lng/teaching/japanese/ENGLISH/tautolog.htm" rel="nofollow">http://cwis.livjm.ac.uk/lng/teaching/japanese/ENGLISH/tautolog.htm</a></p>
<p>This site gives examples and explanations of tautology and oxymorons.  The examples it gives are helpful for clarification, and could be used in a paper if an example was needed. </p>
<p>Tags:Cog 3310 reasoning tautology oxymoron </p>
<p> Rational of tags: Cog3310 to delineate class, reasoning to help those searching for things from the reasoning chapter, or reasoning information in general, tautology and oxymoron- subjects of the site page. </p>
<p><a href="http://aks.rutgers.edu/aksuww/Psych/ConfirmationBias/confirmbias.html" rel="nofollow">http://aks.rutgers.edu/aksuww/Psych/ConfirmationBias/confirmbias.html</a></p>
<p>This site gives information about the confirmation bias and provides an activity called dr. aks 2-4-6 sequence rule.  Helped me for a clarification and alternative explanation of the confirmation bias by actually showing how one employs the bias when reasoning. </p>
<p>Cog3310 Confirmation Bias 2-4-6 sequence rule </p>
<p>Rational of tags: Cog3310 to delineate class, confirmation bias to describe the site&#8217;s subject and help those searching for info about it, and 2-4-6 sequence rule for those looking for an activity to clarify the confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Green</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>I thought it would be interesting to post some things that would be benficial to look at such as ancient logic and inductive logic.

Inductive Logic - plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-inductive/

Review :Excellent source of information if you can digest it.  As it gives some history and also some problems.  You can put this kind of stuff to use not only in chapter 10, but everyday life.  The only problem with using this site is you might get in over your head from the beginning.  The Stanford&#039;s  Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a gateway to a universe of informaion and you could use anything from here for any purpose as long as it is cited.

Tags : Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Logic, Inductive Logic, Reasoning, Philosophy
Tagged Philosophy because it mostly relates ot that field, Stanford because it is from there Encyclopedia, Logic because it is the subject and hand, Inductive Logic because the type talked about and Reasoning for chapter 10.

Ancient Logic -plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/

Review: This is where Logic came from and this history.  The main person to be talked about of course is Aristotle and it will talk about some of his sysllogisms.  Of course Aristotle&#039;s Logic ultimately wasn&#039;t able to work and it was a footboard of modern logic.  Interesting stuff to read and shouldn&#039;t be as hard to understand as the first site was.

Tags : Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Logic, Ancient Logic, Reasoning, Philosophy
Tagged Philosophy because it mostly relates ot that field, Stanford because it is from there Encyclopedia, Logic because it is the subject and hand, Ancient Logic because the type talked about and Reasoning for chapter 10.

Logical Operators - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_operator

Review: Yes it is wikipedia, but I posted this specifically for Professor Chuck.  Just look at the basic Logical operators because they all match up.  I didn&#039;t read anything just found you a good source to look at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it would be interesting to post some things that would be benficial to look at such as ancient logic and inductive logic.</p>
<p>Inductive Logic &#8211; plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-inductive/</p>
<p>Review :Excellent source of information if you can digest it.  As it gives some history and also some problems.  You can put this kind of stuff to use not only in chapter 10, but everyday life.  The only problem with using this site is you might get in over your head from the beginning.  The Stanford&#8217;s  Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a gateway to a universe of informaion and you could use anything from here for any purpose as long as it is cited.</p>
<p>Tags : Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Logic, Inductive Logic, Reasoning, Philosophy<br />
Tagged Philosophy because it mostly relates ot that field, Stanford because it is from there Encyclopedia, Logic because it is the subject and hand, Inductive Logic because the type talked about and Reasoning for chapter 10.</p>
<p>Ancient Logic -plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/</p>
<p>Review: This is where Logic came from and this history.  The main person to be talked about of course is Aristotle and it will talk about some of his sysllogisms.  Of course Aristotle&#8217;s Logic ultimately wasn&#8217;t able to work and it was a footboard of modern logic.  Interesting stuff to read and shouldn&#8217;t be as hard to understand as the first site was.</p>
<p>Tags : Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Logic, Ancient Logic, Reasoning, Philosophy<br />
Tagged Philosophy because it mostly relates ot that field, Stanford because it is from there Encyclopedia, Logic because it is the subject and hand, Ancient Logic because the type talked about and Reasoning for chapter 10.</p>
<p>Logical Operators &#8211; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_operator</p>
<p>Review: Yes it is wikipedia, but I posted this specifically for Professor Chuck.  Just look at the basic Logical operators because they all match up.  I didn&#8217;t read anything just found you a good source to look at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candice Cooper</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>1.) http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/id/research_decis.html
Decision making, risk taking
Review: This website discusses the factors that affect decision making, and provides links for more information on decision making and risk taking.
Tags: cog3310 chapter10 decision making risk taking 
Rationale: cog3310 and chapter 10 to signify the class and book chapter this site pertained to, decision making and risk taking to identify the site’s topics.

2.) http://yudkowsky.net/bayes/bayes.html
An Intuitive Explanation of Bayesian Reasoning
Review: This site gives a detailed explanation of Bayes&#039;s theorem, including examples and problems you can actually work on the screen. It helped me understand it more thoroughly.
Tags: cog3310 chapter10 bayes&#039;s theorem reasoning 
Rationale: cog3310 and chapter 10 to signify the class and book chapter this site pertained to, bayes’s theorem and reasoning to identify the site’s topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) <a href="http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/id/research_decis.html" rel="nofollow">http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/id/research_decis.html</a><br />
Decision making, risk taking<br />
Review: This website discusses the factors that affect decision making, and provides links for more information on decision making and risk taking.<br />
Tags: cog3310 chapter10 decision making risk taking<br />
Rationale: cog3310 and chapter 10 to signify the class and book chapter this site pertained to, decision making and risk taking to identify the site’s topics.</p>
<p>2.) <a href="http://yudkowsky.net/bayes/bayes.html" rel="nofollow">http://yudkowsky.net/bayes/bayes.html</a><br />
An Intuitive Explanation of Bayesian Reasoning<br />
Review: This site gives a detailed explanation of Bayes&#8217;s theorem, including examples and problems you can actually work on the screen. It helped me understand it more thoroughly.<br />
Tags: cog3310 chapter10 bayes&#8217;s theorem reasoning<br />
Rationale: cog3310 and chapter 10 to signify the class and book chapter this site pertained to, bayes’s theorem and reasoning to identify the site’s topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurissa Whitaker</title>
		<link>http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurissa Whitaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cognition.edublogs.org/bookmarking/ch10/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Site 2:
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:WedQGElrb4sJ:hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/00/01/74/PDF/thinkingANDreasoning-MMTvsIRA.pdf+mental+model+approach&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=6&amp;gl=us&amp;client=safari

Review:
This is a pdf file written on the Mental Model Theory vs. the Inference Rule. It discusses how researchers think the the mental model theory is better and give examples to the different approaches. 
It&#039;s a little bit of a longer article but it&#039;s interesting if you want to know a little more information about logical approaches.

Tags:
cog3310 psych mental model theory inference rule approach reasoning logic

Rational:
class, subject matter, all keywords</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site 2:<br />
<a href="http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:WedQGElrb4sJ:hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/00/01/74/PDF/thinkingANDreasoning-MMTvsIRA.pdf+mental+model+approach&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=6&amp;gl=us&amp;client=safari" rel="nofollow">http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:WedQGElrb4sJ:hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/00/01/74/PDF/thinkingANDreasoning-MMTvsIRA.pdf+mental+model+approach&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=6&amp;gl=us&amp;client=safari</a></p>
<p>Review:<br />
This is a pdf file written on the Mental Model Theory vs. the Inference Rule. It discusses how researchers think the the mental model theory is better and give examples to the different approaches.<br />
It&#8217;s a little bit of a longer article but it&#8217;s interesting if you want to know a little more information about logical approaches.</p>
<p>Tags:<br />
cog3310 psych mental model theory inference rule approach reasoning logic</p>
<p>Rational:<br />
class, subject matter, all keywords</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
